SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 205

R.L.ANAND
Smadh Maharaja Sardul Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ved Parkash Etc. – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. Smadh Maharaja Sardul Singh situated at Barnala through Tarsem Chand alias Tarsem Das alias Tarsem Lal Chela Mahant Girdhari Lal Mohatmim, has filed the present Regular Second Appeal and it has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 24.12.1979 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Barnala, who dismissed the appeal by affirming the judgment and decree dated 29.8.1978 vide which the suit of the plaintiff-appellant was dismissed.

2. Before I proceed further, I may also make a mention that when this appeal was pending before the Court of Additional District Judge. Barnala, the plaintiff filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C., for amending the pleadings by incorporating the name of Shri Tarsem Chand as co-plaintiff but that application was also declined vide separate order dated 24.12.1979 the day when the judgment in the main appeal was also pronounced.

3. Some facts can be noticed in the following manner: Smadh Maharaja Sardul Singh earlier filed the suit for possession of the land measuring 131 Kanals 3 Marlas through Tarsem Dass Chela Mahant Girdhari Lal for possession of the land fully described in the head note of the pl






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top