SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 134

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Swatanter Kumar, J.
Balwinder Singh
Versus
Raj Rani
First Appeal from the Order No. 171 of 1998,
Civil Miscellaneous No. 26 of 1998,
Decided On : FEBRUARY 3, 2000

The central legal point established in the judgment is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as a ground for granting divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Headnote:

Divorce - Mutual Consent - Hindu Marriage Act - Section 13-B

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The wife contested the petition, and during the proceedings, the parties mutually agreed to dissolve the marriage under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, and there was no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. The court emphasized the need to release the parties from the legal and religious bond of marriage due to the complete breakdown of the relationship.

Issues: The main issue was the dissolution of the marriage by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and emphasized the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as a ground for granting the decree of divorce.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground of mutual consent, and set aside the previous judgment and punishment imposed on the husband.

Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 16.9.1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala.

2. The appellant Bal winder Singh was married to respondent No. 1 Raj Rani on 26.2.1993 at Chandigarh according to Hindu rites. This marriage between the parties began on unhappy note and the differences arose between them right at the initial stage. These differences were so serious that the husband filed a petition for divorce on 6.11.1993 on the ground of cruelty and desertion. On 17.11.1994, an ex parte decree was passed against the wife. On 30.6.1994, the wife filed an application for setting aside the ex parte decree, on which issues were framed and the decree was set aside on 10.9.1997. The petition was, thus, contested by the wife on merit and ultimately the petition was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala, vide impugned judgment and decree, which has been assailed in this appeal. It may be noticed here that during the pendency of the petition, an injunction order was passed against the husband on 1.7.1994 restraining him from conducting another marriage. The husband took up a plea that he was married on 10.4.1994 for second time but the learned Additional District Judge came to the conclusion that this plea was not correct and the second marriage was solemnised on or about 12.7.1994 and punished the husband by awarding him detention in the civil imprisonment for a term of two months under the provisions of Order 39, Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure vide order dated 16.9.1998, which has also been assailed before this Court.

3. During the present appeal, operation of the impugned judgment dated 16.9.1998 was stayed by the Division Bench of this Court.

4. The parties were directed to appear in person, vide order dated 11.3.1999. They appeared in person and seriously considered the matter in relation to continuation of their matrimonial life or otherwise. After detailed discussions and negotiations between the parties, the parties took time on various occasions to finalise their compromise to put an end to the agony which the parties were suffering, more particulary the wife and minor daughter, who was born out of this wedlock on 12.1.1994. On 19/20.1.2000, the parties filed application for amendment and conversion of the proceedings into a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and prayed for a decree of divorce to be granted to them on mutual consent and as per the terms and conditions arrived at between them and placed on record vide Annexure A-1. Statement of the parties were recorded by the Court on 21.1.2000 itself in presence of the Counsel for the parties and they reiterated the contents of their application and the compromise.

5. The application for amendment and conversion need to be allowed for the reason that substantive relief of the proceedings would still continue to be the same and mud-slinging between the parties would be prevented. As there was no objection and in fact both the parties in their statement on oath prayed for amendment/conversion of the proceedings to be allowed, the Court would have no hesitation in allowing the said application.

6. Resultantly, the application is allowed and petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act with the terms and conditions of the compromise, Annexure A-1, are taken on record.

7. From the statements of the parties, it is clear that the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of any reconciliation between the parties. The husband had made such allegations against his wife which itself is sufficient ground for accepting the request of the wife for dissolving the marriage by mutual consent. No fruitful purpose would be served by continuing this litigation, which has already been on between the parties for the last more than 7 years. The minor daughter is being exposed to an environment which has been adversely






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top