SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 128

R.L.ANAND
Gian Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Singh – Respondent


Judgment

R. L. Anand, J.

1. Gian Singh, Dhian Singh, sons of Sampuran Singh, Ranjit Singh son of Jagir Singh and Fateh Singh son of Ajit Singh (defendants in the trial Court) have filed the present R. S. A. and it has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 1.10.1999 passed by additional District Judge, Amritsar, who allowed the appeal for Harbans Singh and Jagir Singh plaintiffs by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1994 passed by the trial Court and a decree for specific performance of agreement of sale Ex. P1 with respect to the suit land was passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants with costs and directions were given by the first Appellate Court that the plaintiffs would deposit the remaining sale consideration in Court within three months from the date of the decision of the appeal i. e.1.10.1999, failing which their suit shall stand dismissed.

2. Some facts can be noticed in the following manner:-

Harbans Singh son of Bhagwan Singh and Jagir Singh son of Sunder Singh filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement of sale dated 30.12.1991 with respect to the land measuring 23 kanals 10 marlas situated in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top