S.S.Sudhalkar, J.

1. The petitioner has filed this revision petition challenging the orders of Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Authority. Respondents had filed the eviction petition against the petitioner which was allowed. The appeal filed over the same was also dismissed.

2. The case of the respondent - landlord is that the petitioner is in arrears of rent. It is further their case that the suit property is required by them for bona fide personal use. The contention of the respondents is that the suit property was ownership of Central Khalsa Yatim Khana-Chief Khalsa Dewan (hereinafter referred to as the original owner) and the petitioner was the tenant in it at a monthly rent of Rs. 25/-. it was purchased by the respondents from the original owner vide registered sale-deed dated 21.10.1991 and hence they become landlords of the petitioner who became their tenant. The petitioner had not paid the arrears of rent and the property was required bona fide by the respondents for their personal use.

3. The contention of the respondents is that they have two sons, namely, Gurmit Singh and Maninder Singh and three daughters, namely, Parvinder Kaur, Paramjit Kaur and Balbir