SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 1232

G.S.SINGHVI, IQBAL SINGH, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Director, Agriculture, Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Pathak – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. This appeal has been placed before us in view of the order dated 8th October, 1997 passed by the Division Bench for deciding the following question of law :-

"Whether Clause 19 of the Fertilizers Control Order, 1985 is violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India ?"

2. At the hearing, learned Deputy Advocate General pointed out that the order dated 16th September, 1996 passed by the learned Single Judge (with the title case - Tarsem Singh v. Union of India and others, 1996(3) Recent Criminal Reports 633 vide which he allowed a bunch of writ petitions including C.W.P. No. 7566 of 1996 Narinder Pathak v. Union of India & others filed by respondent No. 1 and struck down Clause 19 of the Fertilizers Control Order, 1985 (hereinafter described as `the 1985 Order) by declaring it to be ultra vires to Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also quashed the criminal cases registered against the writ petitioners under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (for short, the Act) has been reversed by the Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 1039 of 1996 - The Director, Agriculture, Punjab and others v. M/s Gurmukh Mal Shibba Mal, 1997(4)





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top