SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 1072

AMAR DUTT
Bimla Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Gautam And Ors. – Respondent


Judgment

Amar Dutt, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23.9.1998 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division). Jalandhar.

2. Bimla Devi had brought a suit for declaration and injunction against respondents-1 to 6 claiming to be the heirs of Devi Dyal in whose favour a succession certificate had already been granted. During the pendency of the suit, Vijay Laxmi wife of Babu Lal had filed on application for being impleaded as a party on the ground that she, along with her husband, had been staying in the property in dispute for the last 30 years, where her husband Babu Lal had been doing the work of ironing clothes. During this period, she and her husband had been looking after Devi Dyal like their father and said Devi Dyal had made her the owner of H. No. 112, RA, Bazar Top Khana, Jalandhar. She also asserted that Devi Dyal had died in her hands and she had made all expenses of medicines, etc. and the parties to the suit had conspired to grab the property in dispute by concealing the fact of her ownership and, therefore, she should be impleaded as a respondent. This application was contested on the ground that the same was not legally maintainable and Vij












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top