SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 1034

V.S.AGGARWAL
Madan Mohan Ahuja – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed by petitioner Madan Mohan Ahuja directed against the order of the learned Rent Controller, Abohar, dated 16.11.1998. The learned Rent Controller by virtue of the impugned order allowed the application filed by the respondent-Union of India.

2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner had filed an eviction application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 , for ejectment of the respondents from the property in question. During the pendency of the petition for eviction, the respondents had been proceeded ex-parte. In the meantime, a number of witnesses were examined by the petitioner. The respondents preferred an application for setting aside of the ex-parte proceedings dated 29.1.1998. It had been asserted that the Central Government had appointed Shri M.L. Chugh, Advocate, at Ferozepur as the counsel for the respondents for conducting their cases. After the expiry of the term of Shri M.L. Chugh, Shri Raj Pal Singh Gill, Advocate, was appointed as Additional Standing Counsel for Union of India. Shri Raj Pal Singh Gill, Additional Standing Counsel, did not appear nor he informed














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top