SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 793

R.L.ANAND
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash Adya – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. This is a landlords Civil revision under section 15 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter called the Act) and it has been directed against the judgment dated 31.1.1983 passed by the Appellate Authority, Ludhiana who reversed the judgment dated 5.11.1979 passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana ordering ejectment of the tenant from the demised premises.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Pritam Singh landlord filed an ejectment application under section 13 of the Act for seeking eviction of his tenant Om Parkash from the demised shop forming part of property unit No. B-II-1755/1755 (new B-VI-407 (old), described in the head note and para No. 1 of the ejectment petition and shown red in the site plan Ex.PW.6/A and AW4/2 and yellow in AW.7/2. The shop in dispute was stated to have been previously owned by Vidya Parkash who let it out to Om Parkash tenant with effect from 1.11.1964 on the basis of the Rent Note executed on 29.10.1964 at the monthly rent of Rs. 30/-. Vidya Parkash sold the property including the demised shop to Pritam Singh landlord-respondent and his brother Gurkirpal Singh vide sale deed dated 12.11.1969. Pritam





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top