SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 299

V.S.AGGARWAL
Hardev Singh Sodhi – Appellant
Versus
Usha Trehan – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. This is a revision petition filed by Hardev Singh Sodhi (hereinafter described as the petitioner) directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Amritsar dated 22.7.1998. By virtue of the impugned order, the learned trial Court refused to treat the issue pertaining to territorial jurisdiction of the Court as a preliminary issue.

2. The relevant facts are that respondent - Smt. Usha Trehan had filed a civil suit for recovery of Rs. 7,99,800/- against the petitioner. It was asserted that the petitioner approached the plaintiff-respondent to start the export and other business in partnership. The respondent alleged that petitioner assured that he will convert his partnership by entering into a regular partnership with the respondent. The petitioner took from the respondent-plaintiff a sum of Rs. 6 lacs. Rs. 2 lacs were paid vide a draft payable at New Delhi on 17.6.1994 and the remaining amount was paid vide draft amounting to Rs. 4 lacs dated 18.6.1994. Thereafter, the petitioner did not take the respondent into business nor any partnership deed was executed. The amount paid was not returned. In paragraph 7 the respondent plea





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top