SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 232

V.S.AGGARWAL
Suraj Mal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. The revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Hansi dated September 2, 1998. By virtue of the impugned order, the learned trial Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the plaint.

2. In brief, the relevant facts are that the petitioner-plaintiff has filed a civil suit for a declaration against the respondents seeking that he is entitled to the transfer of agricultural land in question. He also challenged the auction held on November 28, 1980 by defendant No.2 and seeks permanent injunction to restrain the respondent-defendants from ejecting and taking possession of the land in question.

3. It is not a controversy that on basis of the pleadings of the parties, after the issues had been framed, evidence has been produced. It is towards the end of the trial that the application seeking amendment of the plaint was filed. The petitioner wanted to amend the plaint. He seeks to challenge the order dated August 3, 1968 and also prays for prohibitory injunction.

4. The learned trial Court dismissed the application primarily on the ground that it is highly belated and that the petitio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top