SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 131

M.L.SINGHAL
Betco Chit Fund – Appellant
Versus
Veekay Industries – Respondent


Judgment

M. L. Singhal, J.

1. It was a complaint under Sec.138/ 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by M/s Betco Chit Fund private Limited through its attorney Shri R. L. Sehgal against M/s Vee kay Industries and in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, faridabad. Complainant M/s Betco Chit Fund Private Limited was represented by Sh. V. K. Sharma, Advocate while accused M/s Vee Kay industries was represented by Sh. S. K. Daggar, Advocate. In appeal before the learned Session Judge M/s Vee Kay Industries, appellant-accused was represented by Sh. S. K. Daggar Advocate while m/s Betco Chit Fund Private Limited, complainant-respondent was represented by Sh. V. K. Sharma, Advocate. It was a private prosecution launched bya private complainant viz M/s Betco Chit Fund Private limited. Offence under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not a cognizable offence. The Police has no right to intervene so far as this offence is concerned. If that was so, before the learned Sessions judge, impleading of State of Haryana and appearance of Sh. P. C. Mehta, public Prosecutor was rather a misnomer. Sec.142 of the Negotiable instruments Act itself is clear when it lays down that


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top