SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1604

V.S.AGGARWAL
Satya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kanta Rani – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed by Smt. Satya Devi, hereinafter described as "the petitioner", directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ferozepur, dated 7.5.1998. By virtue of the impugned order, the learned trial Court allowed the application filed by the respondent-plaintiff and directed the petitioner to file reply to the interrogatories.

2. The relevant facts are that respondent No. 1 had filed a suit for declaration claiming 1/4th share from the properties in dispute. It was asserted that the said share is on the basis of inheritance. The said suit was contested by others including the petitioner. Plea had been raised that Maya Devi had left a Will dated 6.11.1990 in favour of the husband of the petitioner and respondents No. 9 and 10 and that the Wills dated 11.10.1990 and 12.10.1990 were cancelled. Issues were framed and the parties led evidence. The case was fixed for evidence in rebuttal. At that stage, respondent No. 1 filed an application under Order 11 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code") for delivering interrogatories to be answered by the petitioner. It was asserted















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top