SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1508

V.K.JHANJI
Girver Dayal Ganda Ram – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Sahai Etc. – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This is tenants revision directed against the order of the Rent Controller whereby application of the tenant (petitioner herein) for setting aside ex-parte eviction order dated 25.9.1990 has been dismissed.

2. Landlords (respondents herein) filed eviction application against the tenant and ex-parte eviction order was passed on 25.9.1990. Landlord in execution took possession of the premises on 21.12.1990. Tenant felt aggrieved of the ex-parte eviction order and thus, filed application under Order 9 rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, for setting aside the ex-parte order. Similarly, tenant also filed an appeal before the appellate Authority against ex-parte order dated 25.9.1990. Appeal against order dated 25.9.1990 was dismissed on 10.5.1993. On dismissal of the appeal, Rent Controller vide order dated 14.9.1996, dismissed the application under Order 9 Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that in view of Explanation added to Order 9 Rule 13 after decision of appeal, application under Order 9 Rule 13 is not competent. Against order dated 14.9.1996 passed by the Rent Controller, tenant filed appeal before the appellate Authority, but the appellate A







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top