V.K.JHANJI
Girver Dayal Ganda Ram – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Sahai Etc. – Respondent
V.K.Jhanji, J.
1. This is tenants revision directed against the order of the Rent Controller whereby application of the tenant (petitioner herein) for setting aside ex-parte eviction order dated 25.9.1990 has been dismissed.
2. Landlords (respondents herein) filed eviction application against the tenant and ex-parte eviction order was passed on 25.9.1990. Landlord in execution took possession of the premises on 21.12.1990. Tenant felt aggrieved of the ex-parte eviction order and thus, filed application under Order 9 rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, for setting aside the ex-parte order. Similarly, tenant also filed an appeal before the appellate Authority against ex-parte order dated 25.9.1990. Appeal against order dated 25.9.1990 was dismissed on 10.5.1993. On dismissal of the appeal, Rent Controller vide order dated 14.9.1996, dismissed the application under Order 9 Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that in view of Explanation added to Order 9 Rule 13 after decision of appeal, application under Order 9 Rule 13 is not competent. Against order dated 14.9.1996 passed by the Rent Controller, tenant filed appeal before the appellate Authority, but the appellate A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.