SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1392

T.H.B.CHALAPATHI
Shishpal – Appellant
Versus
Vikram – Respondent


Judgment

T.H.B.Chalapathi, J.

1. Plaintiffs are the appellants. They filed the suit against their paternal uncle Gyani Ram for declaration of their title alleging that they were looking after him and about six months prior to the filing of the suit, Gyani Ram gave the property to them under a Family Settlement. In that suit, Gyani Ram appeared and filed a written statement acknowledging the transfer of the property in favour of the plaintiffs and also got a statement recorded. Thereafter he died before passing of the decree. The grand son of the said Gyani Ram (daughters son) was impleaded as his legal representative, when the legal representative wanted to file a separate written statement, it was objected to by the plaintiffs on the ground that the legal representative cannot take different plea from that of the original defendant, who died during the pendency of the suit. That objection was upheld by the Trial Court. Nevertheless the Trial Court dismissed the suit on the ground that the question of family settlement does not arise because the plaintiffs have no right, title or interest in the suit property during the life time of Gyani Ram. Aggrieved by the same the plaintiffs pr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top