SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1250

V.K.BALI, B.RAI
Devinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Through Advisor To The Chandigarh Administration – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. By this common order we propose to decide three connected Civil Writ Petitions bearing No. 14804 of 1998, 14903 of 1998 and 14892 of 1998 as the common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions. As agreed between both the parties, the facts have been extracted from CWP No. 14804 of 1998.

2. Devinder Kumar and 56 others through present petition filed by them under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek a writ in the nature of Certiorari so as to quash notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) dated 31.1.1992 (Annexure P-1) as also follow up declaration that came to be issued under Section 6 of the Act dated 31.1.1992 (Annexure P-2) on the only ground that the Land Acquisition Collector has not made the award in the time stipulated and therefore notifications, Award and all subsequent proceedings have lapsed by virtue of provisions of Section 11-A, of the Act. As projected in the petition, it is the case of the petitioners that even though notifications under Sections 4 and 6 were issued on 31.1.1992 and 29.1.1993 respectively and the Collector had not made the Award un









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top