G.S.SINGHVI, IQBAL SINGH
Sukhpal Singh Kang – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
G.S.SINGHVI, J.
1. Whether the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be exercised for relieving the petitioners of their obligation to pay the amount of premium along with interest and ground rent in accordance with the provisions of Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the Chandigarh Leasehold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 1973 Rules) and the terms and conditions of allotment is the main issue which arises for adjudication in these petitions filed primarily for the purpose of restraining the respondents from realising the amount due from the petitioners although the drafting of petitions has been so articulated as to give an impression that the failure of the respondents to discharge their duty to provide amenities has deprived the petitioners of full use and enjoyment of the THE RELEVANT FACTSC.W.P. No. 3370 of 1992On the basis of the highest bid of Rs. 44,00,000/- given by them in the auction held by the Chandigarh Administration on 25-2-1990 in pursuance of advertisement Annexure P. 1 dated 23-2-1990, commercial site (SCO No. 66
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.