V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. The short question that comes up for consideration and seeks answer is as to if the respondent can be termed to have committed any contempt of Court.

2. The relevant facts are that petitioner Piar Kaur is resident of Amritsar. She owns house at Tonga Colony, Green Avenue, Amritsar. Her contention is that respondent was inducted as a licensee. A licence deed was executed. On the expiry of the period of licence, the respondent did not hand over vacant possession of the house to the petitioner. He filed a civil suit for permanent injunction to restrain the petitioner not to interfere in his possession. The petitioner had put in appearance and submitted the written statement. During the pendency of the suit, the respondent agreed to vacate the house on the intervention of certain respectables of the locality. In court, the statements have been recorded. The respondent had made the following statement :-

"Statement of Prithvipal Singh son of Mohinder Singh, aged 54 years, resident of 302, Green Avenue.

It is stated that I took the house No. 46-C situated in Tanga Colony, Green Avenue, Amritsar, from Smt. Piar Kaur on license @ Rs. 1650/- p.m. I will vacant th