V.S.Aggarwal, J.

1. Against petitioner Arshad Ali and Saleem in the petition for eviction filed by the respondents, an order of eviction had been passed Under Section 13(2)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act by the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh, on 2.2.1994 on the ground that the property in question has been sub-let by Arshad petitioner to Saleem. The appeal preferred by the petitioner with the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh, was dismissed on 11.10.1995. Hence, the present revision petition.

2. Some of the relevant facts necessary for the disposal of the present petition for eviction can conveniently be relisted. The respondents alleging themselves as landlord of the shop in question had claimed eviction of the petitioners on the ground of non-payment of rent, change of user of the property which was stated to have been sublet without the consent of the respondents and that the petitioners have caused damage to the properly in question and impaired its value and utility. These grounds of eviction do not survive nor there was any controversy raised in this Court with respect to the findings of the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority whi