SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 376

R.L.ANAND
Sanjay Kumar Alias Sanjeev – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. This is a criminal revision and has been directed against the order dated 26.8.1997 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, who dismissed the application of the present two petitioners S/Shri Sanjay Kumar alias Sanjeev and Sanjeev Madan for discharging them in case F.I.R. No. 266 dated 4.5.1996 under Sections 420 and 304-A read with Section 34 I.P.C. registered in Police Station City Rohtak. Rather the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak decided to frame charge under Section 304 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and Section 419 read with Section 34 I.P.C. against the petitioners.

2. Few facts are necessary before I discuss the rival contentions of the parties with the help of the case law. The present two petitioners were arrested by the police of Police Station City Rohtak for causing the death of one Narain Kumar, a young boy of 19 years, on the allegations that they administered a wrong medicine on 3.5.1996 to Shri Narain Kumar, as a result of which he died on 4.5.1996 at about 3.30 A.M. The complaint was made by the father of the deceased Shri Prem Chand on 4.5.1996 alleging that his son Narain Kumar was having pain in his stomach for











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top