SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 115

R.L.ANAND
Hoffmann Andreas – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Singh Chadha – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. This is a criminal appeal and has been directed against the judgment and order dated 13th June, 1997 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, who convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short `the NDPS Act) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- or in default of payment of fine, the accused was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for allegedly having been found in possession of 1600 grams of charas on 28th April, 1996, when the accused was trying to cross the Attari Border for going to Pakistan. The case property, including the motor bicycle bearing registration No. L1-HH4, was also confiscated to the State, as the Charas was being carried in the said conveyance.

2. Inspector of Customs, Land Customs, Station Attari Road, Amritsar, filed a criminal complaint before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar under Section 18 read with Section 23 of the NDPS Act against the accused on the allegations that on 28th April, 1996 at about 12 Noon the appella
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top