SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 160

S.S.SUDHALKAR
Malkhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Sudhalkar, J.

1. The above-mentioned crl. misc. petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The private respondents in these cases, viz. Sat Ram son of Shamal and Dalle alias Dalbir son of Sheesh Ram are accused in connection with F.I.R. No. 281 dated 6.11.1996, registered at Police Station Chhainsa, District Faridabad, for the offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They were granted bail by different orders by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad. Hence, the father of the prosecutrix has filed this petition for cancellation of bail.

2. I have heard Mr. Anil Walia, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate, for the State and Mr. Tribhuvan Dahiya, learned counsel for the private respondents.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief, as stated in the complaint, can be reproduced as under :-

"Statement of Maheshwati D/o Malkhan Singh, caste Gujjar, r/o Mandhawali, aged 14 years stated that on 2.11.1996 at about 7.00 p.m. at night I went for call of nature to agriculture field and when I reached the field which is near the house of Hari Singh, all of a sudden three boys out of which Sat R






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top