SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 110

SAT PAL
Jage Ram – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Sat Pal, J.

1. This petition has been preferred against the order dated 6.3.1997 passed by District Judge, Bhiwani. By this order, the learned District Judge has set aside the order dated 2.9.1996 passed by the learned trial Court and has allowed the application filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. and has restrained the defendants from raising any construction over any portion of the suit property without getting the suit property partitioned.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent and the defendants/petitioners are joint owner in possession of the suit land measuring 85 Bighas and 11 Biswas as per Khewat No. 16, Khatoni No. 43, 44 in terms of jamabandi for the year 1989-90. The plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for injunction against the petitioners/defendants. It was inter-alia alleged in the suit that the plaintiff and defendants were co-sharer in the suit land and though the suit land had not so far been partitioned, the defendants wanted to raise construction on the said land forcibly without getting the suit land partitioned. Alongwith the plaint, the plaintiff also filed an application under Order 3





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top