S.C.Malte, J.

1. Petitioner 1 is the Bar Association of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, Petitioner 2 is a practising lawyer from Ludhiana. This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the FIR No. 50 dated 15-6-1996 filed against petitioner 2, and for further direction for investigation in the matter by an agency independent of the Punjab Police.

2. Petitioner 2 claims to be entitled to certain properties from his ancestors. Respondent Jai Ram is the uncle of petitioner 2. The contents of the petition indicate that there were civil and criminal cases between these two parties on the issue of right or share in the properties. As the position presently spelt out, the decision in the civil suit was in favour of petitioner 2. Against that decision R.S.A. No. 21 of 1991 is presently pending in this High Court.

3. The incident in this case seems to have arisen out of the dispute over possession of a house. Petitioner 2 claims that on 11-7-1994 respondent 4 in connivance with the local police committed house trespass and caused grievous injuries to petitioner 2, and further