SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1771

G.C.GARG
Parmod Bhushan Paul – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Garg, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the trial Court, whereby it stayed the execution of the decree by order dated 8.10.1979 passed under Order 21 Rule 29 of the code of Civil Procedure.

2. The trial Court in an earlier litigation decreed the suit of the defendant-petitioner for possession by way of specific performance. The suit was decreed against Bachan Singh and another, predecessors of the present plaintiffs. The decree became final. The defendant-respondents took out executions, wherein objections were taken by the present plaintiffs. The objections were rejected/They thereafter filed the present suit for declaration to the effect that they are owner to the extent of 1/6th share in land measuring 21 Kanals 7 Marias. They also moved an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Order 21 Rule 29 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By moving this application it was prayed that the execution of the decree passed in the previous suit be stayed till the disposal of the present suit. This application was contested by the defendant-petitioner by contending that the same was not maintainable as the plaintiffs have no locus standi and that







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top