SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1608

G.S.SINGHVI, IQBAL SINGH
Shashi Singla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the deemed cancellation of the plot allotted to her under the discretionary quota of the Chief Minister. She has prayed that Annexures P.5 and P.6 issued by the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Faridabad, be quashed and the respondents be restrained from interferring with her possession over the plot.

2. Though the petitioner has not given complete facts, the record produced by Shri H.S. Chahar, shows that in the pursuance of the directions given by the then Chief Minister, Haryana, the Secretary, Town and Country Planning Department, wrote letter No. PS-CTP/87, dated 4.6.1987 to the Chief Administrator H.U.D.A. to take action for issuance of formal allotment letter in favour of the petitioner in respect of plot No. 361, Sector 21-C, Faridabad. Vide memo No. ADA-HUDA-87/18808, dated 11.6.1987, the Chief Administrator asked the Estate Officer, H.U.D.A. Faridabad to issue letter of allotment on her depositing 25% of the tentative, cost of the plot at the rate of Rs. 263.12 per square meter. On receipt of these directions, the Estate Officer wrote memo dated 23.6.1987 to the petitioner requiring her to deposi












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top