SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1560

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY, V.S.AGGARWAL
Fazru – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY, A.C.J.

1. This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 11439, 457, 3575, 7664, 8984, 9011, 9110, 9122, 9334, 10536, 10784, 11668, 11791, 12140, 12313, 12475, 13088, 13754, 13877 and 14766 of 1997 as common questions of fact and law are involved in the same.

2. In all these cases, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of S. 175 (1) (q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 as it impinges upon ones right to life and liberty and also violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The relevant provisions are reproduced as under :-

"175. Disqualifications (1) No person shall be a Sarpanch, Up-Sarpanch or a Panch of a Gram Panchayat or a member of a Panchayat Samiti or Zila Parishad or continue as such who;(a) to (p) xx xx xx(q) has more than two living children :Provided that a person having more than two children on or upto the expiry of one year of the commencement of this Act, shall not be deemed to be disqualified.

3 Section 175 (1) (q) of the Act restricts the number of children which a person can have. A person can have any number of children and he should incur no disqualification on this score if he has any number of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top