SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1614

M.L.KOUL
Jyoti Arora – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. Mrs. Jyoti Arora, former Registrar of Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra (hereafter to be called as the accused) is seeking the indulgence of this Court within the provisions of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of a criminal complaint Annexure P-1 filed by respondent No. 2 Ex-Subedar Nar Singh (hereinafter to be called as the complainant) against the accused pending disposal in the Court of Shri B.P. Jindal, learned Special Judge, Kurukshetra, who has taken cognizance against the accused for trial within Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be called as the Act).

2. Mr. Anupam Gupta, learned counsel for the accused argued that complainant has remained deliberately silent to narrate the date in his complaint when atrocious words were used by the accused against the complainant saying that

"Chuhara Chamar Bharti Ho Gai Hain. Thaila Bhar Kar Noton Ka Le Jate Hain. Karte Dharte Kuch Nahin. Tum Jate Ho Ya Dhaka Mar Ke Nikalwaun. Tum Jahan Ke Ho Wahin Rahoge. Ase Hi Tum Ho Asa He Tumbara General Tha Aur Asa He Col. Hai."

3. Rightly so, for his insubordination and dereliction
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top