SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1492

R.L.ANAND
Sunita Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Punjab And Sind Bank – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. Vide this judgment, I dispose of eight Criminal Misc. Nos. 22388-M of 1996, Smt. Sunita Bajaj and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another, 11993-M of 1997, M/s Saraswati Mehra Woollen Mills and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another; 11995-M of 1997, M/s Saraswati Mehra Woollen Mills and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another; 11999-M of 1997, M/s Saraswati Mehra Woollen Mills and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another; 11997-M of 1997, M/s N.K. Woollens and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another; 12003-M of 1997, M/s N.K. Woollens and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another; 12001-M of 1997, M/s N.K. Woollens and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another and 12005-M of 1997, M/s N.K. Woollens and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another, as in the opinion of this Court common questions of law and fact are involved in all the criminal miscellaneous petitions. For the sake of facts, I am taking the facts from Criminal Misc. No. 22388-M of 1996 Smt. Sunita Bajaj and others v. Punjab and Sind Bank and another (supra).

2. Smt. Sunita Bajaj and others have filed the present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., for the quashment of compla















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top