PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.S.Singhvi and M.L.Singhal JJ.
Sunder Mohan Mathur (Deceased By Lrs)
Versus
Ajit Singh
Letter Patent Appeal No. 1729 of 1989,
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 16, 1997
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - COMPENSATION - [SECTION 110-A OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT] - AWARD OF COMPENSATION FOR DEATH OF SON IN MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - PRINCIPLES GOVERNING AWARD OF COMPENSATION - ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AWARDED BY SINGLE JUDGE.
Fact of the Case:
Nagesh Mathur, a 26-year-old technical assistant, died in a motor vehicle accident while inspecting the performance of a tractor driven by Ajit Singh, an employee of respondent No. 2. Nagesh Mathur's father, Sunder Mohan Mathur, filed a claim for compensation under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act against both respondents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of Ajit Singh and that Sunder Mohan Mathur was entitled to compensation for the untimely demise of his son.
Issues: 1. Whether Nagesh Mathur died due to rash and negligent driving of tractor No. HRC 107 by respondent No. 1, the employee of respondent No. 2? 2.Whether the petitioner is entitled to any compensation as the legal representatives of the deceased, If so to what amount ? 3.Relief.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amount of compensation awarded by the single judge was inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 75,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the claim application till realization. The court also held that the deduction of Rs. 10,000/- ordered by the single judge was unjust and should not be made.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the amount of compensation was enhanced from Rs. 40,000/- to Rs. 75,000/- with interest as directed above.
M.L.SINGHAL, J.
1. This is Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment passed by learned single Judge of this Court dated 21-7-1989 in FAO No. 1175 of 1985 titled Sunder Mohan Mathur-appellant V/s. Ajit Singh, whereby he ordered the award of Rs. 40,000/- as compensation to Shri Sunder Mohan Mathur on account of the death of his son Nagesh Mathur aged 26 years in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 4-4-1983 at 3.30 P. M. at the turning near Badkhal Lake on Delhi-Gurgaon road.
2. Facts of the case are as follows :-
Nagesh Mathur was employed with M/s. Eicher Goodearth Limited., 120 SIAN Second Floor, Nehru Place, New Delhi as Technical Assistant. His duty was to supervise, check and inspect the performance of tractor manufactured by respondent No. 2 at Faridabad on the instructions of his employer and in the discharge of his duties, on 4-4-1983 he was deputed to check the performance of tractor No. HRC-170-C being driven by Ajit Singh driver of that tractor employed by respondent No. 2. This driver was driving the said tractor with trolley loaded with earth. Its performance was to be checked by Nagesh Mathur in the Capacity of Technical Assistant. He was sitting on the trolley of the tractor and watching its performance at about 3.30 p.m. on 4-4-1983 when tractor was being driven by Ajit Singh as instructed by the employer (respondent No. 2). Ajit Singh was driving the tractor recklessly, negligently and rashly at uncontrollable speed without taking any precautions. Due to rash and negligent driving, the driver lost control and the tractor and trolley over-turned when the tractor took turn near turning of Badkhal Lake at Gurgaon-Delhi road. Nagesh Mathur fell from the tractor trolley towards the right side of the road and sustained injuries. His body got buried in the piles of earth. He died due to suffocation because of fall of earth on him. He was born in November 1958. He passed intermediate (Science) in the year 1977 from Govt. Jubilee Inter College, Lucknow. After Inter (Science) he qualified three years in Automobiles Engineering in the year 1980 from Govt. Polytechnic, Lucknow. He had been working and earning right since the year 1980 after obtaining diploma certificate. He also worked in Western India Industries, 17, Nav Yug Market, Ghaziabad as Technical Assistant on monthly salary of Rs. 500/-. He was thereafter selected by respondent No. 2 at a salary of Rs. 750/- per month. He was given rise of Rs. 250/- on his previous salary on account of his past experience. Had his life not been cut short, he would have served his family for a long time. He was unmarried. He was the sole bread-winner of the family including his father. Besides his father, his sister was also dependent upon him. Nagesh Mathurs sister Kumari Dheera Mathur was of marriageable age. He was parting Rs. 500/- to the claimant. He would have gone upto the rank of General Manager of the company in the technical side had he remained alive. Apart from that he was deprived of the love and affection of his son. Loss of his son is mental agony to him. On these allegations, he claimed compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,00,000/- under Sec. 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act from both the respondents.
3 Respondent No. 2 contested the claim application. Respondent No. 1 was proceeded ex-parte.
4. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed :-
"1. Whether Nagesh Mathur died due to rash and negligent driving of tractor No. HRC 107 by respondent No. 1, the employee of respondent No. 2?2.Whether the petitioner is entitled to any compensation as the legal representatives of the deceased, If so to what amount ?3.Relief."
5. Vide order dated 9-9-1985, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (in short MACT), Faridabad awarded Rs. 14,300/- to Shri Sunder Mohan Mathur on account of the untimely demise of his son Nagesh Mathur in this motor vehicle accident attributable to the rash and negligent driving of the said tractor by Ajit Singh, driver during the
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.