SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1093

SAROJNEI SAKSENA
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satya Devi – Respondent


Judgment

1. Husband-petitioner has filed this revision against the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot, dated April 11, 1996, whereby he has enhanced the maintenance awarded to the respondents under S. 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, the Code) and has made it payable from the date of application. The respondents had filed the said application for enhancement of maintenance under S. 127 of the Code on March 19, 1994.

2. Respondent No. 1 is the wife and respondents 2 and 3 are the children of the petitioner. These respondents filed an application under S. 125 of the Code for the grant of maintenance, which was allowed vide order dated January 13, 1986. The wife was granted maintenance at the rate of Rs. 160/- per month and the children were granted maintenance at the rate of Rs. 80/- per month each. The respondents filed an application under S. 127 of the Code, which was allowed on February 12, 1992. Her maintenance was enhanced to Rs. 250/- per month and for other respondents it was enhanced to Rs. 200/- per month each. The husband filed revision against that order in this Court. This Court reduced the maintenance of respondents 2 and 3 to Rs. 150/- per

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top