SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 1099

R.L.ANAND
Babu Lal Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

R.L.Anand, J.

1. Though in the considered opinion of this Court, the present criminal revision has become infructuous on account of the main F.I.R. out of which the present revision for the superdari of the goods the subject matter of the F.I.R. has arisen, yet in order to obviate any chance of remand by the higher Court, I would like to dispose of the revision petition on merits by discussing the facts and the submissions which have been raised before this Court by the respective counsel for the parties.

2. Shri Babu Lal Jain, who was the complainant of F.I.R. No. 457 dated 28th May, 1996 registered at Police Station Central, Faridabad, has filed the present criminal revision and it has been directed against the order dated 20th August, 1996 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, who accepted the revision petition filed by M/s Exquisite Enterprises, and set aside the order dated 22nd July, 1996 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, who earlier ordered for the release of the goods in question in favour of the complainant Shri Babu Lal Jain on his furnishing superdarinama in the sum of Rs. 75,00,000/- with one surety in






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top