SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 958

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY, N.K.AGRAWAL
Budho Devi – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner – Respondent


Judgment

N.K.Aggarwal, J.

1. This is a petition by Smt. Budho Devi and Dharamvir Jain under Article 226/227 of the Constitution for quashing the notice dated 17.4.1997, issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil), Ferozepur Jhirka, to petitioner No. 2 (Dharamvir Jain), asking him to attend a meeting of the Municipal Committee convened on 2.5.1997 to consider the "no confidence motion". The petitioner have also sought a writ of prohibition for restraining the respondents No. 9 and 10 (Niranjan Lal and Smt. Sarti Devi respectively) from attending the meeting.

2. Petitioner No. 1, Smt. Budho Devi was elected as President of the Municipal Committee. On a requisition submitted by certain members of the Municipal Committee, the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon authorised S.D.O. (C), Ferozepur Jhirka, to convene a special meeting of the Municipal Committee to consider the "no confidence motion" against petitioner No. 1 Smt. Budho Devi. The petitioner No. 1, thereafter, informed the Deputy Commissioner through application dated 4.4.1997 that the Municipal Councillors, Niranjan Lal and Smt. Sarti Devi (respondents 9 and 10 respectively) stood disqualified under Section 13-A of the Haryana Munic









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top