PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
R.S.Mongia and M.L.Koul JJ.
Shiv Kumar
Versus
Geeta
First Appeal from the Order No. 7 of 1997,
Civil Miscellaneous No. 5518 of 1997,
Decided On : MAY 19, 1997
Divorce - Mutual Consent - The court granted a decree of divorce to the parties by mutual consent, allowing the withdrawal of cases and quashing of proceedings against each other.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant and respondent got married in 1993 but have been living separately since 1994 due to incompatibility. The appellant filed for divorce, which was initially dismissed, but later both parties decided to seek a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the marriage was irretrievably broken, reconciliation was not possible, and the parties had been living separately for a significant period. The court accepted the mutual consent for divorce and allowed the withdrawal of cases and quashing of proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of divorce by mutual consent and the settlement of claims between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, the mutual consent of the parties, and the settlement of claims as the basis for granting the decree of divorce and allowing the withdrawal and quashing of proceedings.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and granted the decree of divorce to the parties by mutual consent. The respondent had no claim against the appellant, and the proceedings against each other were withdrawn and quashed.
R.S.Mongia, J.
1. Shiv Kumar, appellant, was married to respondent Geeta daughter of Sewa Ram on May 9, 1993, at Ambala Cantt in accordance with Hindu rites. There has been no issue out of the wed-lock. For various reasons, the parties have not been able to pull on together as husband and wife and are staying separately from each other since October,1994. In fact almost from day one of marriage, there have been bickerings between them and they found that they were not temperamentally compatible to each other to live as husband and wife. A petition for grant of divorce was filed by the appellant against his wife Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the matrimonial Court at Ambala City on April 24,1995. That petition was, however, dismissed on November 18, 1996. Against that judgment, F.A.O. No. 7-M of 1997 had been filed. During the course of the proceedings in the said appeal, the appellant and respondent Geeta decided to get a decree of divorce by mutual consent. For that matter, an application was moved to convert the proceedings Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act to one Under Section 13-B of the Act alongwith a joint application for the grant of decree of divorce Under Section 13-B of the Act. That application has been granted by us by an order of even date and the application Under Section 13-B of the Act has been taken on record. We have recorded the statements of the parties. It has been stated by the appellant-husband that a stage had reached where there is no possibility of reconciliation. The parties have been living separately since October, 1994, and there has been no cohabitation between them since then. A sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- has been given to the respondent Geeta towards permanent alimony/maintenance and she has stated that she will have no claim of any kind against the appellant or his property. She further agreed to withdraw the case filed against her husband Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ambala, and she would have no objection if the proceedings in the case arising out of F.I.R. No. 3 of 1995, Police Station, Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt., Under Sections 406/498-A I.P.C. against the appellant are quashed under the inherent powers of this Court.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through their statements, we are satisfied that this case is of a broken marriage and reconciliation is not possible. The parties have been living separately from each other since October, 1994. The prayer of the parties that the compulsory waiting period Under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act be reckoned from the date of the filing of the petition Under Section 13 of the Act is accepted as otherwise it would unnecessarily prolong the agony and the litigation as we are satisfied that the parties cannot reconcile. There is no issue out of the wed-lock. They have settled all the claims against each other regarding permanent alimony/maintenance with the payment of Rs. 1,50,060/- by the appellant to the respondent. We have heard learned counsel for the State also regarding the quashing of the proceedings arising out of F.L.R. No. 3 of 1995, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt, Under Sections 406/498-AIPC. He also submitted that in view of the fact that the parties have mutually agreed to grant of divorce by mutual consent, it will be in the interest of both the parties if the proceedings arising out of the aforesaid F.I.R. are quashed.
3. For the foregoing reasons we allow this appeal petition Under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and grant the decree of divorce to the parties by mutual consent. The respondent, Geeta, will have - no claim against the appellant on his property on any count. The proceedings launched by the respondent, Geeta, against the husband, Shiv Kumar, Under Section 125 of the code Criminal Procedure in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ambala, would stand withdrawn Since the parties have
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.