Dr. Sarojnei Saksena, J.

1. This is a desperate, dejected, rejected and discarded lover-cum-husbands revision petition, whose petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed by the matrimonial Court vide judgment Exhibit P-1 and who is now convicted and sentenced under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 9 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1500/- in default further rigorous imprisonment for three months.

2. Brief resume of the facts of the case is that complainant-Harbhajan Singh is the father of Satvinder Kaur. Long back Satvinder Kaurs maternal uncle was married to the sister of accused-petitioner Sham Sunder. On 19.12.1984 accused-petitioner filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act which was decided against him on 1.3.1986. During the pendency of that matrimonial case, on 28.9.1985 the complainant-respondent filed this complaint under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused-petitioner.

3. In the complaint, the complainant averred that his daughter Satvinder Kaur is unmarried and is residing with him in his village Khun Kalan. In the petition fi