SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 673

V.K.BALI
Neera Tangri – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Dass Khurana – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. I propose to decide these five appeals bearing Nos. 256, 296, 297, 298 and 470 of 1995 by common order as all the appeals arise from one accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has chosen to dispose of all claim applications by one order. Learned Counsel for the parties state that the same course be adopted by this Court also. Facts giving rise to these appeals need brief mentioned.

2. On 9th of June, 1991, Om Parkash Tangri alongwith his wife Smt. Neera Tangri, his daughter Ashu Tangri, sons Arun Kumar and Vinay Kumar and one more person Parbhat Singh was coming from Delhi to Rajpura by Maruti Car No. CHE 6900. After crossing Madhuban Police Complex, when the car was heading towards Karnal on its left hand side being driven by Om Parkash at slow speed, one Truck No. HRJ 6451 belonging to Pritam Dass Khurana, which as per the claimants was being driven rashly and negligently on a very fast speed by Jit Singh respondent No. 2 came from the opposite direction on wrong side and struck against Maruti Car resulting into injuries to all the occupants of the car. The car was totally smashed. All the injured were removed to Arpana Hospital, Madhuban immediately











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top