G.C.Garg, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated August 20, 1990 passed by the executing Court whereby the objection of the petitioner, who is widow of Om Parkash Judgment debtor, was dismissed by holding that she cannot claim protection of Section 60(1) (ccc) of the Code of Civil Procedure for attachment and sale in execution of a decree.

2. The controversy raised in this revision is, whether the house owned by Om Parkash Judgment debtor and inherited by his widow Smt. Sheela Rani the petitioner, is immune from attachment and sale in execution of a decree passed against Om Parkash.

3. Few facts relevant for the disposal of this revision may be noticed: The Punjab and Sind Bank Limited filed a suit against Om Parkash and another for the recovery of money, which was decreed. The plaintiff took out execution. However, Om Parkash judgment debtor died during the pendency of the proceedings. The petitioner, widow of Om Parkash, was brought on the record. The house owned by Om Parkash judgment debtor was sought to be attached in execution of the decree in favour of the respondent-bank. An objection was taken by Sheela Rani, petitioner that the house belo