SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 794

V.K.JHANJI
Raj Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Lal Chand – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the trial Court whereby application filed by the plaintiff to prove Memorandum of partition dated 4.2.1978 by way of secondary evidence, was dismissed.

2. Plaintiff (petitioner herein) filed a suit, against her brother, Lal Chand, for possession by way of partition of the properties as fully detailed in the body of the plaint, on the allegation that her father, Hem Raj, was the owner and on his death, she became entitled to inherit the property to the extent of half share. Defendant (respondent herein) in his written statement set up a Will alleged to have been executed by the deceased-father, in his favour. In the replication plaintiff alleged that the defendant along with his father and uncle executed memorandum of partition dated 4.2.1978. During the course of evidence, an application was filed by the plaintiff to prove memorandum of partition by way of secondary evidence. On contest, this application was dismissed by the trial Court primarily on the ground that plaintiff had no-where alleged in her application that as to how the document was lost, destroyed or was in possession of the defendant. T



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top