SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 688

R.K.NEHRU
Gurbaksh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jagat Singh – Respondent


Judgment

R.K.Nehru, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 9th June, 1978 passed by the first Appellate Court affirming on appeal those of the learned trial Judge.

2. For better grasp of the controversy, the following pedigree-table may be looked into:-


Chanan Singh = Smt. Bholi (Plaintiff No. 2)

|

--------------------------------------------------

| | |

Gurbax Singh Jagat Singh Smt. Prito

Defendant No. 1 Plaintiff No. 1 Plaiintiff No. 3

|

-----------------------

| |

Bhupinder Singh Surinder Singh

(Son) (Son)

Defendant No. 2 Defendant No. 3

3 Chanan Singh (hereinafter referred to as the testator) was the owner of 29 Kanals 4 Marlas of land in suit. He died leaving behind his widow Smt. Bholi (plaintiff No. 2) and Jagat Singh (defendant No. 1) and also one daughter Smt. Prito (plaintiff No. 3). Bhu



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top