V.K.BALI
Gurdeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Lamba – Respondent
V.K.Bali, J.
1. Pritam Singh, whose where-abouts were unknown, was proceeded against ex-parte after making some attempts to serve him at his residential address, House No. 1678, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh. The petition moved by the respondent-landlord, Vinod Kumar Lamba was with a view to seek eviction of the tenant, Pritam Singh from the premises in which he was inducted as tenant through a lease deed dated November 20, 1986 in S.C.F. 10, Sector 22-D Chandigarh. The wife of the tenant, Pritam Singh filed two applications, one for setting aside ex-parte proceedings against her husband Pritam Singh and the other from impleading her as a party-respondent in the petition for eviction. The learned Rent Controller after getting reply of both the applications from the respondent-landlord dismissed the same primarily on the ground that Gurdeep Kaur, wife of tenant had no locus standi to move the applications, referred to above as she had no authority on the basis of which she could file applications on behalf of the tenant. It was held that she was not authorised by the respondent to file any application on his behalf and she was also not attorney of the respondent. Having found so,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.