V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This is tenants revision against the order of the Appellate Authority ordering his ejectment. Ejectment of the petitioner was sought by the respondent on the ground that tenant has removed wall A B C D and converted two rooms into one hall. Allegation was also made that he had constructed three Parchhatis and these alterations had impaired the value and utiliy of the premises. Petition was contested by the tenant who denied having impaired the value and utility of the premises. His case in the written statement was that the tenanted premises are in the same condition in which it were let out to him. With regard to Parcahatis, it was stated that the same were already in existence when he took the premises on rent. The Rent Controller, on appreciation of the evidence on record, returned a finding in favour of the tenant and in consequence thereof petition for ejectment was dismissed. On appeal by the landlord, the order of the Rent Controller was set aside. The Appellate Authority ordered ejectment of the tenant on the ground that he had removed the wall and also constructed Parchhatis thereby impairing the value of and utility of the premises. The order of