SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 14

S.D.AGARWALA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Krishna Bus Service (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
New India Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Agarwala, J.

1. By the present judgment we propose to dispose of L. P. A. Nos. 578, 579 and 580 of 1984, The facts have been taken from the former case.

2. The aforesaid three appeals have been filed by the owner of the bus which had been involved in the accident. The only point involved in all the appeals is as to whether the amount of compensation in respect of the deceased Sher Singh was payable by the owner of the bus or by the Insurance Company The learned Single Judge has categorically found that Joginder Singh the bus driver, did not possess a driving licence. In view of this finding of fact it is clear that the Insurance Company is absolved of the liability for payment of compensation in accordance with the terms of the policy. We do not find any error in the finding recorded by the learned Single Judge.

3. Mr. B. N. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the appellant has, however, placed reliance on Skandia Insurance Co. Ltd. v Kokilaben Chandravadan, (1987-1) 91 P.L.R. 665 (S.C.), to contend that Joginder Singh was in fact the conductor of the bus and as the appellant had not authorised him to drive the bus, the liability to pay compensation for the death of the decea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top