SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 1031

A.L.BAHRI
Maruti Ltd. (In Liqn. ), Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Pan India Plastic Pvt. Ltd. , New Delhi – Respondent


Judgment

1. On 2/03/1984 a decree for recovery of Rs. 1,29,562.40 with interest and costs was passed in favour of the decree-holders M/s. Maruti Ltd. and M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd. against the judgement-debtor M/s. Pan India Plastic Pvt. Ltd. through Rabindera Grewal, Managing Director and Shri Ranindra Grewal Managing Director, M/s. Pan India Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Execution of the decree was taken in this Court for recovery of the decretal amount which included interest and costs was stated to be Rs. 2,00,364.50, by attachment and sale of movable property described as air-conditioner, car, scooter, electric fans, radio, transistors, T.V., refrigerator, machinery, office furniture, cash, all other goods and every other movable and immovable property found at the spot. Thus warrant of attachment was issued. The attachment could not be effected as per report on the warrant of attachment which is Exhibit A.4. The report is dated 7/05/1985.

2. Some contempt proceedings were initiated by the Court in view of the report-Exhibit A.4 against two persons, namely, Rabindra S. Grewal and Dhan Raj. Ultimately both these persons submitted affidavit copies which are Annexures A.2 and A.3. They tendered u






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top