A.L.Bahri, J.

1. At the time of admission of the aforesaid writ petition the Division Bench doubted correctness of the decision of the earlier Division Bench rendered in C.W.P. No. 2232 of 1970 (Hardial Singh v. The State of Haryana and Ors., C. W. P. 2232 of 1970), decided on December 24, 1970, and referred the matter to the larger Bench that is how the matter is before the Full Bench for reconsideration of the rule laid down in Hardial Singhs case (supra).

2. The Collector, Agrarian, Nabha, on January 24, 1983, decided surplus area case of Smt. Gurnam Kaur wd/o of Ishar Singh. It was held that she did not have any- surplus area. Annexure P. 1 is the copy of the order An appeal was taken to the Commissioner filed by the Collector of the district (Additional District Collector) through Naib Tehsildar, Agrarian. The commissioner, vide his order dated October 3, 1984 accepted the appeal. Gurnam Kaur petitioner moved the Financial Commissioner in revision against the order of the Commissioner. The revision was accepted on March 18, 1986 and the case was remanded to the Commissioner. On remand the Commissioner vide his order dated October 27, 1986, recommended to the Financial