SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 942

V.K.JHANJI
J. S. Sethi – Appellant
Versus
Parkash Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. Petition for ejectment on the ground of sub letting filed by the respondent was dismissed by the Kent Controller. In an appeal filed by the landlady, ejectment order was passed by the Appellate Authority. The tenant (herein-after referred to as the petitioner)] was allowed two months time to vacate the premises subject to the condition that he pays entire arrears of rent within one month. It is not disputed before me that the rent was not paid in terms of the orders dated March 5, 1991. Mr. R. S. Bindra, Sr. Advocate for the tenant states at the bar that the rent was not deposited because the order dated March 5, 1991, passed by the Appellate Authority was not made available to the tenant. Be that as it may, a revision petition was filed in this court impugning the order of the Appellate Authority. The revision petition came up for motion hearing on 5th April, 199) when the record was summoned for 30th April, 1991. The ejectment of the applicant was not stayed. Before the case could be listed on 30th April, 1991, the landlady in execution of the order took possession of the premises on 10th April, 1991. Civil Misc. No. 2992 C. II of 1991 was filed in this





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top