SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 895

G.R.MAJITHIA
Sukhdev Sharma Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

G.R.Majithia, J.

1. This judgment disposes of C.W.P. No. 3269 of 1990 and 21 other connected writ petitions, i.e. C. W. P. Nos. 3270, 3271, 3654, 4668, 4670, 4716, 4743, 4741, 4758, 4865, 4862, 4954, 4972, 5056, 5160, 5041, 5241, 5173, 6591, 12016 of 1990 and 4810 of 1991. In these petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, serious challange has been made to Notification No. LAC (P)/NTLA-87/1914, dated April 21 1987 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act) and Notification No. LAC (P)-NTLA-88/2785, dated April 20 1988, issued by the Haryana Government, Urban Estate Department under Section 6(2) of the Act,

2. Reference to relevant facts has been made from the Pleadings in C. W. P. No. 3269 of 1990 except where it is otherwise necessary to refer to a particular fact in a particular writ petition, it has been so made from the pleadings of that writ petition :-

The process of compulsory acquisition starts with the issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Act. The object of issuing a notification under Section 4 of the Act is two fold First it is a public announcement by the government and a public notice by t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top