SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 683

V.K.JHANJI
Lachhman Dass – Appellant
Versus
Charan Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This is tenants revision against the orders of the authorities below ordering his ejectment.

2. Landlady (respondent herein) filed petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking ejectment of her tenant (petitioner herein) on various grounds including the property being unfit and unsafe for human habitation and material impairment in the value and utility of the building.

3. Petition was contested by the tenant who denied the allegations contained in the ejectment petition. The Rent Controller, after finding that the tenant had made material alterations and thereby impaired the value and utility of the building, ordered ejectment of the tenant The ground of building being unfit and unsafe for human habitation was also decided in favour of the landlady, Tenant preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority affirmed the order of the Rent Controller only with regard to the ground of impairment of value and utility of the building. The other ground, namely, the building being unfit and unsafe for human habitation, was decided against the tenant. Tenant has come in re





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top