SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 199

N.K.KAPOOR
Jaswant Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hardial Singh – Respondent


Judgment

N.K.Kapoor, J.

1. Ishar Singh, karbans Kaur, Jaswant Kaur, Rajbans Kaur; Tejinder Singh, minor son, Inderprit Kaur and Manpreet Kaur, Minor daughters of Sukhdiai Singh, husband of Rajbans Kaur; Narain Kaur and Satwant Kaur filed a suit against Hardial Singh and others for declaration to the effect that they are owners-in-possession of the land shown in sub-heads (A) and (B) as given in the plaint or in the alternative for possession of 6/7th share of the land measuring 41-IC 9-M comprised in Hadbast Khasras detailed as A B C D E (as per plaint) situated in the area of village Kokari Kalan, Ajitwal and Kokari Hairan, Tehsil Moga, on the ground that a distance arose between Ishar Singh, defendant for the reason that the latter was cultivating the land as son of Ishar Singh and started claiming hostile possession whereupon Ishar Singh, instituted a suit against him The case of the plaintiffs further is that Smt. Attar Kaur, wife of Ishar Singh died and Hardial Singh set up a Will claiming ownership of the land left by her on the basis of the Will which was the subject-matter of dispute between the parties. In fact, appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the mutation sanctioned


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top