SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 145

S.S.SODHI, G.C.GARG
Ali Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Karima – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Sodhi, J.

1. The controversy here is with regard to law governing succession amongst Muslim Kambojs of village Jamalpura of Tehsil Malerkotla, namely ; whether custom or Muslim Personal Law applies. The contest being between the sons and daughters of Shahzada, who died on September 19, 1974 leaving behind the property in suit.

2. There is a conflict of judicial precedents in the matter, in that, in Babu and Anr. v. Halima, (1983) 85 P. L. R. 335 it was held by J. V. Gupta, J. that Kambojs of Malerkotla are predominantly an agricultural tribe and are governed by custom in the matter of inheritance. G. C. Mital, J. on the other hand in Abdul Rahim and Ors. v. Yusaf and Ors., (989-l) 85 P. L. R. 200. held that Mohammadan Kambojs of village Jamalpur, Tehsil Malerkotla are governed by Personal and not Customary Law, for the purposes of succession. It is this conflict of view that led N. K. Kapoor, J. to refer this matter to a larger Bench.

3. As mentioned earlier, the property in suit was owned by Shahzada, who died in September 1974. The plaintiffs here are the three daughters and son-Ali Mohammad while the defendant is the other son-Ali Mohammad of the said Shahzada. After







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top