SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 76

HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Through Its Administrator – Respondent


Judgment

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.

1. By the present judgment, I propose to dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 12936, 13958 and 14898 of 1991. The facts have been taken from C.W.P. No. 12936 of 1991.

2. The petitioners are owners of land, details whereof have been given in Annexure P-.1 to the petition, situated within the Notified Area Committee, (in short NAC) Manimajra, Union Territory Chandigarh. It has been averred that Manimajra was declared a notified area vide Notification dated 12th April, 1976, and certain Sections of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1971, (hereinafter called the Municipal Act) which include Sections 3, 53, 58 and 192 etc. were extended to this area with effect from 11th June, 1976. It has also been averred that by virtue of Sections 242 and 243 of the Municipal Act, a NAC is deemed to be a Municipal Committee and the area, thereof to be a Municipality. It has been averred in the writ petition that respondent No. 1 i e. the Union Territory Administration issued a Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter called the Act) for acquisition of the land mentioned in Annexure P-]. The Notification was published in the Chandigarh Administration Gazette













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top