SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(P&H) 1173

S.S.GREWAL
Sneh Lata – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Grewal, J.

1. Ranbir Mehta. husband, Som Parkash and Raj Rani Parents-in-law. Jagjivan Ram, husbands brother, Sneh Lata, husbands sister of Saroj deceased and Dr. Satya Wati Loomba, in whose clinic the deceased remained on 3.3.1987 from 7 p. m. upto 2:00 a m. on 4.3.1987 and was subsequently referred to Civil Hospital, Ambala, were challaned under Sections 304A 304B, 315, 498A and 120 of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of First Information Report No. 32 dated 12th August, 1987 registered at Police Station, Lalru, district Patiala. The Additional Sessions Judge, vide his impugned order dated 4th of February, 1989 discharged Dr. Satya Wati Loomba under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) and framed charge against the rest of the accused under sections 498A, 120B, 315 and 304B of the Indian Penal Code. Aggrieved against the impugned order Punjab State filed Criminal Revision No. 716 of 1989 whereas Vijay Kumar complainant filed Criminal Revision No. 342 of 1989. In both these petitions order discharging. Satya Wati Loomba under section 227 of the Code has been challenged whereas Criminal Misc. No. 3384-M of 1989 unde














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top